Angry words in Security Council
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.New York - There was an unusually testy exchange inside the United Nations Security Council last night, writes David Usborne. The Secretary- General, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, personally reprimanded the US ambassador, Madeleine Albright, for the contents of a statement issued in her name earlier in the week criticising him for suggesting that the UN should have nothing to do with monitoring the peace accord for Eastern Slavonia in Croatia.
With ranks of ambassadors looking on in astonishment, Mr Boutros-Ghali described her statement as "vulgar". She retorted in turn that it was "unacceptable" for him to characterise her statement in such terms.
Both left the chamber fuming, but with sealed lips.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments