Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Wrong kind of kitty litter blamed for $240m radiation leak at New Mexico nuclear waste dump

"Chemically incompatible" contents caused Drum 68660 to burst open, contaminating 21 people

Helena Williams
Friday 27 March 2015 09:49 GMT
Comments
An improper mix, including the wrong kind of cat litter, in a drum of nuclear waste caused the barrel to burst and release radioactive materials.
An improper mix, including the wrong kind of cat litter, in a drum of nuclear waste caused the barrel to burst and release radioactive materials. (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A radiation leak at an underground nuclear waste dump in New Mexico was caused by the wrong kind of cat litter, an investigation has found.

Government scientists concluded on Thursday that last year’s major accident at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad was caused by “chemically incompatible” contents, including the wrong kind of kitty litter used to absorb liquids, which reacted inside a barrel of waste causing it to burst open and spew radioactive materials.

The incident on February 14 contaminated 21 people with low-level radioactivity.

The drum of waste, containing radioisotopes like plutonium, was improperly packaged at the Los Alamos National Laboratory near Santa Fe before arriving for disposal, according to a U.S. Energy Department Report.

A summary of the report said workers put the kitty litter brand “Swheat Scoop” in to Drum 68660. The improper mix caused the barrel to heat up and generate gas which caused it to rupture and release radioactive materials.

“Experiments showed that various combinations of nitrate salt, Swheat Scoop®, nitric acid, and oxalate self-heat at temperatures below 100°C. Computer modeling of thermal runaway was consistent with the observed 70-day birth-to-breach of Drum 68660,” the summary said.

The workers were exposed to radiation in amounts not expected to threaten their health, according to Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC, the contractor that operates the plant.

Energy Department officials estimated in September that the cost of the initial recovery of the dump would be $240 million. It may be two years or more before the dump is fully operational.

The report confirms the agency’s preliminary theories about the cause of the costly mishap and also clarified that just one barrel of waste from Los Alamos was to blame.

New Mexico slapped the Energy Department with $54 million in fines in December for violation of state hazardous waste permits tied to WIPP and the Los Alamos lab.

Also last year, a team of federal inspectors released a report that cited chronic lapses in safety procedures at Los Alamos that contributed to the radiation leak.

The lab’s “waste processing and safety-related control procedures should have prevented the addition of these potentially incompatible materials,” the inspectors said of the ruptured waste barrel.

The Energy Department could not be reached immediately for comment late Thursday.

Additional reporting by Reuters

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in