Twitter explains why it will not ban Donald Trump (without mentioning his name)
President recently threatened North Korea by mentioning his 'nuclear button'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Twitter has made clear in its strongest terms yet that it will not remove Donald Trump’s account despite the President’s affinity for provocative tweets.
Earlier this week Mr Trump effectively threatened North Korea with nuclear war, telling North Korean leader Kim Jong Un “that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works”!
Amid the ensuring uproar, which included members of Congress calling for more authority over the President’s ability to launch nuclear strikes, Twitter was again called upon to square its rules prohibiting violent or abusive speech with messages that could fuel international conflict.
In a post entitled “World Leaders on Twitter,” the site said “Blocking a world leader from Twitter or removing their controversial Tweets, would hide important information people should be able to see and debate”.
“It would also not silence that leader, but it would certainly hamper necessary discussion around their words and actions,” the post said.
As Mr Trump has repeatedly unleashed controversy with a tap of his finger, Twitter has offered shifting explanations for why he would not be penalised under its rules prohibiting abuse.
When he retweeted an anti-Muslim group in December, the site said keeping the messages visible would ensure airing “see every side of an issue” and served “a legitimate public interest in [their] availability”. When he warned North Korea its leaders “won’t be around much longer” — which Pyongyang dubbed “a declaration of war” — Twitter cited “newsworthiness” and “public interest”.
Even as it has steadfastly said Mr Trump does not violate its rules, Twitter has cracked down against white supremacists and others who transgress its updated guidelines by removing their blue verification marks. It has also bolstered its policy on hate speech by pledging to punish messages that promote or glorify violence.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments