Trump budget to cut rail services to hundreds of rural communities
'These hard working, small town Americans don’t have airports or Uber to turn to; they depend on these trains,' says Jim Mathews of the National Association of Rail Passengers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump’s proposed budget cuts could lead to 220 US cities across 23 states losing out on all of their passenger train services, according to a new study.
The analysis from the National Association of Rail Passengers (NARP) concluded that cuts to the infrastructure budget, would cut off Amtrak, transit, and commuter rail programs, and even air service to some rural towns.
This would not only cost construction and manufacturing jobs, but place a disproportionate amount of pain on rural and working class communities, it said.
As a result it estimated that 220 cities in 23 states will have no passenger rail transport as a result.
If Mr Trump's budget proposals are approved, all funding would be cut for Amtrak, the country’s only national passenger rail service.
The cuts are part of a proposed 13 per cent, or $2.4bn (£1.9bn), reduction in the Department of Transportation budget.
Cuts of a further $2.3bn (£1.85bn) to the Federal Transit Administration’s capital investment programme that helps communities start commuter rail projects, have also been suggested.
NARP President Jim Mathews said the move is “ironic” given Mr Trump’s repeated promises of renewing the infrastructure sector on the campaign trail, including jobs for those to work on new projects.
Many of the communities that could be affected are in rural areas which voted for Mr Trump in the presidential election. The Us leader won nearly 70 per cent of the rural vote in 2016.
Mr Mathews said that the proposed elimination of Amtrak’s long distance trains was "cutting a vital service that connects these small town economies to the rest of the US."
He added: "These hard working, small town Americans don’t have airports or Uber to turn to; they depend on these trains."
Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao also put a halt a massive California project to improve their commuter rail system that would have created an estimate 9,600 jobs in the state.
Mr Matthews said that when voters in these 220 communities voted for Mr Trump they expected his $1 trillion infrastructure plan, set to be announced in full in May, would include public transportation projects to “revitalise” their communities.
“This budget does exactly the opposite,” he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments