Kamala Harris gets potentially huge boost due to change in Democrats' presidential primary schedule
Shift will force candidates to spend time and money on populous California
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.California has moved up its presidential primary by months, a change that could reconfigure the 2020 election and boost Senator Kamala Harris if she runs for president.
Despite being America’s most populous state, California has wielded minimal influence over which presidential candidates win their parties’ nominations. Because California has not held its primaries until June, contenders typically have sewn up the votes they need before the Golden State votes.
But a bill shifting California’s nominating contest to March, signed into law by Gov Jerry Brown on Wednesday, will reverberate through the nominating process.
Presidential contenders will now need to invest time and money into vying for California’s hundreds of delegates. Running campaigns in California is a costly proposition because the vast state encompasses several major media markets, which requires multiple ad buys.
That would be a sharp departure from a status quo in which candidates tend to visit California to raise money but do little to campaign there, spurring complaints that millions of voters are being effectively sidelined in the nominating process. Proponents of moving up California’s primary have argued that the diverse state is more representative of the national electorate than overwhelmingly white early voting states like Iowa and New Hampshire.
“The Prime Time Primary puts California voters in the front seat in choosing our next president and will change our elections for the better”, state Sen Ricardo Lara, the bill’s author, said in a statement. “We have a responsibility to drive a different agenda at the national level and promote inclusion and consensus not the politics of division”.
The move could also buoy Ms Harris, a first-term Democrat whose potential presidential aspirations have fueled rumors since shortly after she took office. Having served two terms as the state’s attorney general, Ms Harris would have the advantage of name recognition and an existing donor network.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments