Atheist organisation files lawsuit against Donald Trump's 'Religious Liberty' executive order
A group from the Midwest claims the president is breaching the constitution
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Godless are trying to take down Donald Trump.
A organisation of atheists from Wisconsin has filed a lawsuit challenging the president’s so-called “religious liberty” order, claiming his move to allow religious groups to preach politics from the pulpit is in breach of the constitution.
The Freedom from Religion Foundation (FFRF), established in 1978, said recent comments by Mr Trump were a clear attempt to roll-back the provisions of the Johnson Amendment, a 1954 law that prohibits all tax-exempt institutions from campaigning for political candidates.
The group cited the president’s comments when he signed a recent executive order that directed the US’s Internal Revenue Service (IRS), not to target churches.
“Now [you're] in a position to say what you want to say. I know you’ll only say good,” he said to an audience of religious leaders gathered in the White House’s Rose Garden.
“Freedom is not a gift from government, it’s a gift from God.”
The atheist group said that his actions would would selectively benefit churches and religious organisations by allowing them to endorse political candidates without risking losing their tax-exempt status.
Annie Laurie Gaylor, an executive director with the FFRF, said Mr Trump was seeking to use this order to "usher in a new era" of church politicking.
“Trump is communicating to churches that his administration will not enforce the Johnson Amendment,” said Ms Gaylor. “The IRS needs clear direction that it must enforce the law equally.”
Mr Trump’s views on religion have been fluid, both when he was a presidential candidate and now as the country’s leader.
While campaigning during the Iowa primaries he famously appeared confused on how to behave when he attended a communion service at a neighbourhood church.
However, he has worked hard to court the support of religious conservatives and evangelicals.
Jerry Falwell Jr, the head of Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia, was among his early backers. Vice President Mike Pence is also a member of the religious right who has sought their backing.
Two days before the election, Mr Pence appeared in a campaign video aimed a religious conservatives in which he urged people to vote for Mr Trump for two key reasons - his support of a Supreme Court Justice who would defend the “rights of the unborn”, and his promise to repeal the Johnson Amendment.
Mr Pence said: “The Johnson Amendment has literally been on the books since the 1950s and it essentially threatens tax-exempt organisations and churches with losing their tax status if they speak out against important issues facing the nation from the pulpit.”
The FFRF lawsuit says: “Among its many faults, [Mr Trump’s] order requires the IRS to selectively and preferentially discontinue enforcement of the electioneering restrictions of the tax code against churches and religious organisations, while applying a more vigorous enforcement standard to secular non-profits.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments