US House of Representatives makes having an abortion harder if you are poor
Legislation targets women who rely on private insurance schemes for terminations
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The US House of Representatives has voted to pass legislation making it more difficult for poor women to have an abortion.
Despite the recent demonstrations across US cities demanding women’s rights be protected, the ‘No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act’, also known as HR7, was approved by 238 votes to 183.
It is designed to prevent terminations from being covered by insurance funded by the taxpayer, such as 'Obamacare' or Medicaid – relied on by many lower income people and public sector employees.
Millions of women stand to be affected, according to the Centre for Reproductive Rights.
The legislation must now be approved by the Senate, though this is not guaranteed and a similar attempt was blocked twice by the Democrats during Mr Obama’s tenure.
If passed, HR7 would pass the Hyde Amendment – an addition to the budget which bans taxpayer funded abortions except with the above caveats – into law. The amendment has been passed in every budget since 1976 but has never been enshrined in legislation.
It would be much harder to remove once passed and the move, initiated by Republican representatives, is being widely regarded as part of the party’s anticipated attack on abortion.
“It’s particularly shameful that politicians in Congress are voting to restrict a woman’s ability to get basic health care services just three days after millions of women, men, and families mobilized and marched for their rights,” said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Centre for Reproductive Rights.
“In far too many circumstances, a woman’s paycheck determines whether she can get the health care she needs when she has made the decision to end a pregnancy. For low-income women and women of color, the barriers to care are even more severe. It’s cynical and cruel that politicians have made it a top priority to further drive safe and legal abortion out of reach for millions more women.
“We call on Congress to abandon this latest attempt to rob women of their rights and focus their efforts on measures which would actually improve the lives of our families and communities.”
Earlier this week, President Trump passed an executive order reinstating the ‘Mexico City Policy’ which forces NGOs to agree to “neither perform nor actively promote abortion as a method of family planning in other nations” as a condition aid funding, even if non-US funds are being used for the abortions.
Reproductive rights campaigners slammed the decision, pointing out that the effect of such rules simply increases unsafe abortions in developing countries, greatly endangering women’s health.
One family planning NGO, Marie Stopes International, estimated the Mexico City Policy could result in 6.5 million unintended pregnancies, 2.2 million abortions, 2.1 million unsafe abortions and 21,700 maternal deaths – in Mr Trump’s first term alone.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments