Supreme court launches attack on gay marriage ahead of Amy Coney Barrett nomination
Two conservative justices made an unexpected statement attacking 2015 decision, causing alarm amongst campaigners
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
An unexpected statement by two Supreme Court justices dennouncing same sex marriage has caused alarm over the court’s direction even before Donald Trump’s appointment, Amy Coney Barrett, arrives on the bench.
Associate justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito argued on Monday that a landmark decision in 2015 enabling same sex couples to marry created “bigots” of “religious adherents”.
Their remarks came as the court declined to hear a a case brought by a former Kentucky county clerk, Kim Davis, who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and was sued.
Agreeing with the court’s decision not to hear Davis’s appeal on the matter, Mr Thomas and Mr Alito called her request a “stark reminder of the consequences” of the court’s decision in Obergefell v Hodges, which paved the way for same sex marriage in the United States.
“By choosing to privilege a novel constitutional right over the religious liberty interests explicitly protected in the First Amendment, and by doing so undemocratically, the Court has created a problem that only it can fix,” wrote Mr Thomas.
“Until then, Obergefell will continue to have ‘ruinous consequences for religious liberty,” he continued, whilst claiming that Davis “may have been one of the first victims of this court’s cavalier treatment of religion in its Obergefell decision” and warned: “She will not be the last.”
The voluntary four-page statement prompted dismay amongst LGBTQ campaigners, legal experts and lawmakers on Monday, with Alphonso David, president of the Human Rights Campaign, telling the Washington Blade that the Court believed LGBTQ rights to be “ruinous”.
“[It] proves yet again that a segment of the Court views LGBTQ rights as ‘ruinous’ and remains dead set against protecting and preserving the rights of LGBTQ peoples,” he argued.
Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, meanwhile, argued that Republicans were trying to remove LGBTQ rights and marriage equality.
Referring to Republican attempts to fast-track the confirmation of president Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, Mr Schumer wrote on Facebook that voters should "Make no mistake”
“This is what's at stake with Republicans trying to force through this illegitimate process. People's rights. Ending marriage equality. Stripping away LGBTQ+ rights. We are fighting to stop it."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments