Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Republican senator key to securing new Supreme Court judge says anti-abortion candidate 'unacceptable'

‘A candidate for this important position who would overturn Roe v Wade would not be acceptable to me,’ says Susan Collins

Chris Stevenson
New York
Sunday 01 July 2018 22:57 BST
Comments
Senator Susan Collins: 'I don't want to see a judge take an activist agenda on Roe v Wade'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A Republican senator who is likely to cast a key vote in the fight to confirm a new Supreme Court judge has said that any nominee hostile to the landmark Roe v Wade abortion rights ruling would be “unacceptable”.

Susan Collins, a Maine senator, made clear that she sees the 1973 ruling as law, amid deep dismay from activists that a new more conservative judge on the court could put a number of women’s rights in peril.

President Donald Trump is set to nominate his second justice onto America’s highest court, following the announcement of conservative Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement on Wednesday. Mr Trump had previously restored the nine person court’s conservative majority with the confirmation of Justice Neil Gorsuch last year.

“I believe very much that Roe v Wade is settled law… it has been established as a constitutional right for 45 years,” Ms Collins told ABC’s This Week.

“A candidate for this important position who would overturn Roe v Wade would not be acceptable to me as that would indicate an activist agenda that I don’t want to see a judge have,” she added.

During Mr Gorsuch’s confirmation, Ms Collins and Alaska Republican Lisa Murkowski were the subject of intense scrutiny, both being staunch supporters of women’s rights. With the removal of the requirement for 60 votes in the 100 person Senate to confirm a Supreme Court nominee, it is fair to say that both Ms Collins and Ms Murkowski have essentially become the most important people in any vote.

Trump claims he won't ask potential SCOTUS nominees their stance on Roe v Wade, but will be 'putting conservative people on'

Republicans had to remove that 60 vote threshold, so votes are now won by a simple majority, in order to get Mr Gorsuch passed. Democrats cried foul at the imposing of the “nuclear” option – but even with that this time, Republicans have little room for manoeuvre.

Arizona senator John McCain is ill and away from Congress, so there is a chance he may have to miss any vote, leaving the slimmest GOP majority of 50 to 49. If either of Ms Collins or Ms Murkowski were to withhold their support from any potential nominee, then Republican leadership would be relying on Democrats for support.

As a result, the focus has turned to Democratic senators Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Joe Donnelly of Indiana and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota. The three face re-election in November in states that Mr Trump won in the 2016 presidential election. All three also voted for Mr Gorsuch. They were the only Democrats to do so.

However, the current confirmation hearing and vote is likely to be even more fierce. Democrat leadership, including the party’s top person in the Senate, Chuck Schumer, has already started to paint the new choice as the most important in a generation, and said that any push for a judge looking to change precedent would be fought against.

With Justice Kennedy having acted as the court’s swing vote on a number of occasions, and having supported the liberal faction in winning efforts on abortion and gay rights, activist groups are planning multi-million dollar nationwide campaigns to try to ensure a more neutral judge is chosen.

Mr Trump has said he plans to announce his nominee on 9 July and that he has narrowed his list of contenders to about five, including two women. He wants to move quickly ahead of the midterm elections in November, choosing from a 25 person list of contenders compiled for him by White House lawyers and conservative legal activists in Washington. Ms Collins suggested there are a number of names on that list she would not support.

Speaking to NBC’s Meet the Press, Republican senator Lindsey Graham said he would not vote for a nominee who has made up their mind about specific cases, including Roe v Wade.

Perhaps aware of the controversy, Mr Trump said during an interview aired on Fox News on Sunday that he would not be asking any of the nominees about how they would vote on Roe v Wade.

“Well that is a big one, and probably not,” Mr Trump said. “They are all saying ‘don’t do that, you don’t do that, you shouldn’t do that’.”

“But I am putting conservative people on,” the president added.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in