Sean Spicer says 20% tax on Mexican imports to fund the border wall was just one ‘example’ and not a policy proposal
The Press Secretary tried to clarify his remarks soon after he made them
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Shortly after Donald Trump’s Press Secretary prompted a furore by suggesting a 20 per cent import tax on Mexican goods would help pay for the border wall, he tried to row it back.
Sean Spicer told NBC News that the tax was not a policy proposal, it was an example of how the US would pay for the wall and then ask Mexico to reimburse them.
The clarification came soon after he told a group of reporters on the Air Force One plane that the administration would hike Mexican imports by a fifth to cover the cost of the wall, prompting critics to question why he appeared to be making up policy on the spot.
White House chief of staff Reince Priebus also told NBC that the tax was only one of a "buffet of options", adding to a statement made the previous evening House Speaker Paul Ryan, who told MSNBC there were "various ways" Mexico could reimburse the US.
American taxpayers would be hardest hit by any such hike, paying more for imported goods such as cars and fruits and vegetables.
It could also prompt Mexico to hike prices on imported US goods in return, as well as violate trade deal NAFTA, which was signed under Bill Clinton and which Mr Trump has vowed to scrap.
Mr Trump has signed an executive order to begin the constriction of the wall along the 2,000 mile border already but has not suggested how Congress will stump up the $8 to $14 billion required.
Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto said in a statement on Wednesday evening that he would not pay for the wall, and that he "regretted and rejected" the US’ suggestion they would chip in.
The Mexican President cancelled a trip to visit Mr Trump next week following the incident which has only served to worsen relations between the neighbouring allies and trading partners.
Mr Trump responded he would "go a different route" and that the meeting would have been "fruitless".
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments