Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sarah Palin allegedly gave misleading statistics about military deployment in recent speech

Former vice presidential candidate mixes enlistments and deployments in same statement to confusing effect

Payton Guion
Wednesday 04 March 2015 17:45 GMT
Comments
(AP Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In her address to the Conservative Political Action Conference last week, Sarah Palin pointedly spoke on the stresses faced by military families facing deployments to overseas wars and those faced by veterans returning from war.

Mrs Palin is familiar with those stresses, as she is a military mom. But in her speech, she gave a statistic about deployments and enlistments that appeared to show an large increase in military commitment but is somewhat misleading, the Washington Post reported. Read her quote below.

“The strain on military and their families, it is enormous,” she said at CPAC. “During World War II the average deployment in the combat theatre, it was six months. Korean War, nine months. Vietnam, 13 months. For Iraq and Afghanistan, an initial enlistment was 45 months.”

Here, Mrs Palin is comparing the deployment periods – the amount of time troops are in an operations theatre – of past wars to the enlistment periods – the total amount of time a soldier is committed to the military – of recent wars.

The Post reported that the enlistment period of WWII was the duration of the war plus six months, much longer than the deployment period of six months quoted by Mrs Palin.

The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq did have deployments longer than those of previous wars, as some people were deployed as long as 24 months, with most falling into a deployment range of 12 to 18 months, the Post reported.

Deployments undoubtedly take a toll on members of the military and their families, this story is not attempting to downplay any hardships caused by military service. But by comparing deployments of past wars to enlistments in more recent conflicts, Mrs Palin is looking two different things.

Mrs Palin and her representatives did not respond to an email seeking comment on this story.

Follow @PaytonGuion on Twitter.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in