Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ryder decides against taking the stand at shoplifting trial

David Usborne
Saturday 02 November 2002 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

The trial of Winona Ryder for shoplifting lost a little of its suspense yesterday when the news that the star of Girl, Interrupted and Little Women would not be taking the stand.

After the prosecution rested its case late on Thursday, the Los Angeles courthouse of Judge Elden Fox had been agog to see whether the defence would bring their client to the stand and whether Ms Ryder would summon up a performance sufficient to prove her innocence.

The actress is charged with stealing goods worth $5,500 (£3,516) from the Saks Fifth Avenue department store in Beverly Hills last December, including a Dolce and Gabbana handbag and Calvin Klein socks. If she is convicted, she could be sentenced to three years behind bars.

The final witness for the prosecution, Detective Mark Parker, described Ms Ryder as "very calm" on the night of her arrest after she was detained by guards as she left the store. "She had a smile on her face," he testified, adding that "she was nervous about what was going to happen."

Mr Parker also suggested Ms Ryder had said she had stolen the goods in preparation for a film role. "At one point she was explaining that she was getting in character for a role as a kleptomaniac," he said. "She wanted to see what it was like to shoplift."

In cross-examination, the defence lawyer Mark Geragos accused another prosecution witness of fabricating her testimony and attempting to sell the story. But the witness, Colleen Rainey, a former security officer with Saks, denied his claims. She said she saw Ms Ryder snipping security tags from items she was stealing. "Have you sold The Winona Ryder Story?" Mr Geragos asked Ms Rainey, after telling the court that her boyfriend was a struggling screenwriter. "No," she said.

Mr Geragos said Ms Rainey had not mentioned key details of her testimony in an original incident report to police, including the claim that she had seen the removal of the security tags through slats in a fitting room door.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in