Obama criticised for being 'too timid' on Iranian crisis
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Under pressure from several quarters to harden his stance, President Barack Obama condemned the regime in Tehran for the violence against protesters, but still gave no indication that he was ready to step back from his campaign promise to reach out to the country.
The "world is watching," Mr Obama told the ruling clergy in his sternest statement yet. "We mourn each and every innocent life that is lost.
"We call on the Iranian government to stop all violent and unjust actions against its own people."
Reports that at least 10 people had been killed on Saturday in a government crackdown further underlined the difficulty of Mr Obama's position. Already, the turmoil has complicated Mr Obama's attempts to draw Iran into more constructive talks with the West on its nuclear programme. Making any such diplomatic overtures to a regime sullied by the events of recent days now looks less tenable.
One leading voice on foreign affairs on Capitol Hill, Senator Richard Lugar of Indiana, yesterday suggested that new contacts should still be pursued with Iran, adding that either Mr Obama or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton should be ready to meet their counterparts from Iran.
Some analysts see an opening for the US over the longer term from the turmoil in Iran if it has the effect of loosening the unquestionable authority of the ruling theocracy.
The fine line walked by Mr Obama over the last several days may already be paying off. It has not gone unnoticed in Washington that just as several European Union leaders were faster to lambaste Iran for the conduct of the election and repression of the protests, so some of those countries have been the targets of retaliatory rhetoric, among them Britain especially.
Nevertheless, Mr Ahmadinejad yesterday included the US alongside the UK in a new broadside against claimed foreign interference, warning that "hasty comments" would mean neither country would "have a place in the circle of the Iranian nation's friends".
There are growing divides within Washington over the wisdom of Mr Obama's approach. An influential member of the US Senate, Republican Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, said the President was too "timid and passive".
But Mr Obama said the Iranian people will ultimately judge the actions of their own government. "If the Iranian government seeks the respect of the international community, it must respect the dignity of its own people and govern through consent, not coercion."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments