Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

NSA mass phone surveillance is ‘lawful’, US federal judge rules

Decision comes just weeks after another judge said government’s data collection programme was probably ‘not constitutional’

Adam Withnall
Saturday 28 December 2013 10:00 GMT
Comments
The American Civil Liberties Union sued earlier this year after former NSA analyst Edward Snowden leaked details of the secret programmes that critics say violate privacy rights
The American Civil Liberties Union sued earlier this year after former NSA analyst Edward Snowden leaked details of the secret programmes that critics say violate privacy rights (AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The NSA’s programme of mass phone data collection is “controversial but lawful”, according to a ruling from a federal judge in the US.

Ruling in the case brought against the government by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), US District Judge William H Pauley III issued a 53-page court opinion declaring the surveillance is a “counter-punch” to terrorism.

Judge Pauley’s ruling yesterday comes just weeks after fellow US District Judge Richard Leon said that wide scale phone tapping was “likely not constitutional”, violating a ban on unreasonable search.

“The question for this court is whether the government's bulk telephony metadata program is lawful,” wrote Judge Pauley. “This court finds it is.”

Given the conflict on the issue within the courts, ACLU lawyers said they would be taking their case to an appeal in Manhattan. “This mass call tracking program constitutes a serious threat to Americans' privacy and we think Judge Pauley is wrong in concluding otherwise,” said Brett Max Kaufman, an attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project.

Explaining his decision, Judge Pauley said the 9/11 terrorist attacks showed the government could not afford to miss any threat.

“This blunt tool only works because it collects everything,” the judge said. “The collection is broad, but the scope of counterterrorism investigations is unprecedented.”

Judge Pauley nonetheless accepted that such a programme, if unchecked, “imperils the civil liberties of every citizen” and said he was aware of debate surrounding the subject across the nation, in Congress and at the White House.

The ACLU sued the government earlier this year in the wake of security leaks from the former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, and Judge Pauley said that the source of the revelations played a part in his decision.

“It cannot possibly be that lawbreaking conduct by a government contractor that reveals state secrets — including the means and methods of intelligence gathering — could frustrate Congress's intent. To hold otherwise would spawn mischief,” he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in