Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Neil Gorsuch: Donald Trump's Supreme Court pick said 'employers should ask women if they want children'

'It concerned me that a man educating female lawyers would be discounting their worth publicly,' says Jennifer Sisk

Lucy Pasha-Robinson
Monday 20 March 2017 12:21 GMT
Comments
President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch
President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee once said that women “manipulate” companies to access maternity leave and should be questioned about their plans to have children before they were hired, it has been claimed.

Judge Neil Gorsuch allegedly told a class of students that law firms had to protect themselves from female employees.

Former law student Jennifer Sisk, made the claim in a letter shared by the National Employment Lawyers Association and the National Women's Law Center.

“He asked the class to raise their hands if they knew of a female who had used the company to get maternity benefits and then left right after having a baby,” she said.

“At that point Judge Gorsuch became more animated saying ‘C’mon guys’. He then announced that all our hands should be raised because ‘many’ women use their companies for maternity benefits and then leave the company after the baby is born.”

Ms Sisk said she was “distressed” by the content of the discussion and “surprised” someone of Judge Gorsuch’s professional standing could hold such views about female attorneys.

“It concerned me that a man educating female lawyers would be discounting their worth publicly,” she wrote. “Now it concerns me that a man who is being considered for our highest court holds views that discount the worth of working females.”

The letter has been sent to the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Chuck Grassley, and ranking member Senator Dianne Feinstein.

Another legal document has also been sent to the senators, calling for the claims to be entered into the hearing record ahead of Judge Gorsuch’s official appointment to Mr Trump's cabinet.

The allegations are likely to add to the tough scrutiny that awaits Judge Gorsuch at his Senate confirmation hearing that starts this week.

Democrats will be seeking to make the case that he is a pro-business, social conservative who is too closely tied to the president to be impartial.

They have said they will probe him on several fronts based on his record as a federal appeals court judge and a Justice Department appointee under former President George W Bush.

Another line of attack previewed by Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, will focus on rulings the judge has made in which corporate interests won out over individual workers.

His views on social issues, including a 2006 book he wrote in which he argued against the legalisation of assisted suicide and euthanasia, are likely to be discussed too.

Judge Gorsuch will fill the vacancy created by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia last March.

His appointment has already proved controversial because Barack Obama's nominee for the seat, Judge Merrick Garland, was blocked by Republicans who refused to hold a confirmation hearing or a vote.

They said the next president should choose a nominee. As a result, some commentators have called it a "stolen seat".

With the court ideologically split, with four judges on the conservative and liberal wings, Judge Gorusch will tip the balance to the right.

Like all Supreme Court justices he would serve for life if confirmed.

Additional reporting by Reuters

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in