Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Moms' force parties to rethink US gun laws

Mary Dejevsky
Tuesday 16 May 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Democratic and Republican politicians were confronting the possibility of a signal change in the American political landscape yesterday after the massive turnout at Sunday's Million Mom March in favour of tougher gun laws.

Even the fiercest opponents of the gun-control cause conceded that the predominantly suburban crowd on Washington's National Mall probably exceeded half a million, while the organisers claimed a crowd approaching 750,000. Parallel demonstrations by gun advocates were held in Washington and across the United States, but attracted far fewer people.

Responding to the success of Sunday's march, Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association (NRA) said gun registration and licensing - measures demanded by the marchers - would be tantamount to "a controlled burn of the second amendment ... and setting fire to freedom should never be the answer". The NRA, which has 3.5 million members and contributes to the campaign funds of many Republican Congressmen, is expected to make a fuller response at its national convention, which opens in North Carolina on Friday.

Donna Dees-Thomases, who instigated the Million Mom March, urged the marchers to continue their involvement with the gun control movement by forming groups to lobby state and national politicians.

Connie Morella, a Maryland Republican Congresswoman sympathetic to gun control, reiterated the importance of building on the achievements of the march if the anti-gun movement was to become a political force. And the New York Times said in an editorial: "The hands that rock the nation's cradles have the potential to rock its political institutions - but only if they keep rocking hard."

A point repeatedly emphasised by speakers at Sunday's rally was the potential voting power of the protesters, many of whom had travelled hundreds of miles to make their voices heard. This overwhelmingly white, middle-class constituency were seen by analysts as key to the election of Bill Clinton, and no presidential candidate can afford to take their loyalty for granted.

Speakers called on mothers to cast or withhold their vote on the single issue of gun control. This opens the prospect of gun control being used by the political left and centre in a similar way to the use of the issue of abortion by the conservative right. Their voting strength may help to explain why the Governor of Texas, George W Bush, announced on the eve of the march that the state would offer free child-proofing trigger locks to anyone who wanted them. Mr Bush said that he would also subsidise a similar measure nationwide should he become president.

Capitalising on the support for gun control as shown in Sunday's march, President Clinton yesterday renewed his call for Congress to pass the gun-control legislation that has been stalled since its defeat in the House last year.

One notable absentee, both yesterday and from the march, was the Vice-President, Al Gore, whose casting vote had ensured passage of the legislation through the Senate. One explanation for his low profile on the issue could be a poll last week which suggested he was unexpectedly losing support among male voters, most of whom support gun ownership.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in