Iraq crisis: Critics in Congress line up to lambast 'weak' Obama response
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.President Barack Obama came under fire from his opponents in Washington yesterday as the US launched further air strikes against militants from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isis) in Iraq.
Congressional Republicans are broadly in favour of military action in the region, but several have criticised the President’s strategy, saying it does not go far enough.
The senator and former Republican presidential nominee John McCain said the US should conduct strikes not only against Isis in Iraq, but also against the group’s strongholds in neighbouring Syria. “This is turning into – as we predicted for a long time – a regional conflict which does pose a threat to the security of the United States of America,” Mr McCain told CNN, describing the Obama administration’s response to the crisis as “very, very ineffective, to say the least”.
The Republican congressman Peter King called Mr Obama “weak” for relying on air strikes conducted by warplanes and drones while refusing to send US ground troops into the region. Appearing on NBC’s Meet The Press, Mr King said: “We should take nothing off the table.”
The South Carolina senator Lindsey Graham told Fox News he feared Isis-inspired attacks on US soil. “If [Mr Obama] does not go on the offensive against Isis, Isil, whatever you guys want to call it, they are coming here,” Mr Graham said. “And if we do get attacked, then he will have committed a blunder for the ages.”
Several prospective 2016 Republican presidential candidates appeared over the weekend at the Iowa Family Leader Summit in Ames, Iowa, where they too offered their criticisms of the White House strategy in Iraq. Senator Ted Cruz from Texas said the rise of Isis was simply, “the latest manifestation of the failures of the Obama-Clinton foreign policies”.
Others in Washington were more circumspect. The Democrat senator Richard Durbin told NBC that the US should help to prevent genocide in Iraq, but the responsibility for solving the crisis ultimately fell to the Iraqi government. “Only Iraq can save Iraq,” Mr Durbin said, adding that there was little appetite in Congress for further military intervention. “Escalating it is not on the cards,” he said.
A Wall Street Journal-NBC poll found last week that 60 per cent of Americans disapprove of the President’s handling of foreign policy, while a July survey by Pew found that 55 per cent felt the US had no responsibility to tackle the violence in Iraq.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments