House veteran faces misconduct censure
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.One of the most likable veterans in Congress would become the 23rd House member in US history to be censured if the House of Representatives goes along with a recommendation of its ethics committee.
House members face the solemn task of disciplining one of their own when Charles Rangel, a New York Democrat, is reproached for financial and fundraising misconduct.
It will be one of the more unpleasant jobs in the waning days of the 111th Congress because Mr Rangel, from Harlem, is legendary for his friendliness and for greeting anyone he passes at the Capitol.
The normally self-confident 80-year-old, newly re-elected and with 40 years of House service behind him, was reduced to pleading with the ethics committee on Thursday to refrain from calling him corrupt.
The ethics committee deliberated for about three hours before voting 9-1 to recommend a resolution of censure, plus a requirement that Mr Rangel pay taxes he owes on income from a holiday home in the Dominican Republic.
If the House agrees to a censure resolution, Mr Rangel would stand before his colleagues at the front of the chamber – known as the well – where the resolution of censure would be read by the Speaker. The House has the option of changing the punishment to a reprimand, which avoids the oral rebuke at the well.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments