Ethics trial over politician's tax bill
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A rare ethics trial began yesterday for the Democratic congressman, Charles Rangel, who headed the House of Representatives tax-writing committee, but has acknowledged shortchanging the government on his own tax bill.
A House ethics panel will judge whether filing an amended tax return, belatedly paying his taxes, and other financial and fundraising practices, violated the congressional rule book.
The trial of the Representative is an embarrassment for Democrats, who are still reeling from losing their majority in the House to Republicans in the 2 November election. Mr Rangel has represented New York's Harlem district for 40 years.
Mr Rangel walked out of his trial, after being denied his plea for a delay until he could obtain a new lawyer. The panel's top lawyer then quoted Mr Rangel's own words from previous proceedings to argue that the lawmaker violated House rules.
Chief House ethics counsel Blake Chisam, assuming the role of prosecutor, played a video of a Rangel speech on the House floor in August. Mr Rangel, former chairman of the tax-writing committee, acknowledged in that presentation that he had used House stationery to raise money for a college centre named after him. He also said that he had been tardy in filing taxes and financial disclosure statements, but that he had no intention of breaking any rules.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments