Donald Trump asked by Pulitzer prize winner: 'Just who the hell do you think you are?'
Dear 'Mr So-Called President'...
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump has been mocked in an editorial by a Pulitzer Prize winner, who asked “just who the hell do you think you are”.
Leonard Pitts Jr was responding to the executive orders issued by the US President, his slating of the media and the declaration by Mr Trump's adviser Stephen Miller’s that “powers of the president” will “not be questioned”.
“What you do ‘will not be questioned?’ Lord, have mercy," the 59-year-old, wrote in his nationally syndicated column in the Miami Herald newspaper.
“That's the kind of statement that, in another time and place, would have been greeted with an out-thrust palm and a hearty ‘Sieg heil'", said the American, author of Becoming Dad: Black Men and the Journey to Fatherhood, and Before I Forget.
Mr Pitts, who won the Pulitzer Prize for Commentary in 2004, added: "Here in this time and place, however, it demands a different response," he added. “Just who the hell do you think you are?”
He addressed his letter to “Mr So-Called President”, a reference to Mr Trump’s smearing of the federal judges who temporarily blocked his immigration ban.
He went on to accuse the FBI director James Comey and Russian president Vladimir Putin of aiding Mr Trump’s journey to the White House.
The Californian also added the election victory “does not entitle you to do whatever pops into your furry orange head”.
"Let's be brutally clear here. If you were a smart guy with unimpeachable integrity and a good heart who was enacting wise policies for the betterment of all humankind, you'd still be subject to sharp scrutiny from news media, oversight from Congress, restraint by the judiciary ¬– and public opinion," he said.
“And you, of course, are none of those things.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments