Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Donald Trump fails to mention climate change in Earth Day statement

Former Presidents George Bush and Barack Obama both addressed global warming in their Earth Day statements

Maya Oppenheim
Sunday 23 April 2017 11:15 BST
Comments
The billionaire property developer sought to defend his team’s environmental plans in the statement
The billionaire property developer sought to defend his team’s environmental plans in the statement (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump has drawn criticism for failing to mention climate change in his Earth Day statement.

Despite the fact the 47th global annual event urges people to “build a global citizenry fluent in the concepts of climate change and aware of its unprecedented threat to our planet”, the President ceased to make any explicit mention of global warming.

The omission marks a significant break with previous US governments. Fellow Republican President George W Bush highlighted the need to address climate change in his final statement and Barack Obama mentioned the term five times in his 2016 earth day statement.

The billionaire property developer sought to defend his team’s environmental plans in the statement, saying: “Rigorous science is critical to my Administrations efforts to achieve the twin goals of economic growth and environmental protection.”

Last month, Mr Trump signed an executive order overhauling Obama-era rules directed at tackling climate change. The controversial order seeks to suspend, rescind or review more than a half-dozen measures in an effort to boost domestic energy production in the form of fossil fuels.

“My administration is committed to advancing scientific research that leads to a better understanding of our environment and of environmental risks,” the statement added. “As we do so, we should remember that rigorous science depends not on ideology, but on a spirit of honest inquiry and robust debate."

”This April 22nd, as we observe Earth Day, I hope that our nation can come together to give thanks for the land we all love and call home," he concluded.

Mr Trump, who has previously claimed that climate change is a hoax “invented by the Chinese”, later took to Twitter to argue that growth in the economy boosts the protection of the environment.

“I am committed to keeping our air and water clean but always remember that economic growth enhances environmental protection. Jobs matter!” he said.

Mr Trump’s comments coincide with thousands of scientists and their supporters marching across the globe to protest against what they perceive to be Mr Trump’s rejection of science on Earth Day. More than 600 marches took place around the world on every single continent but Antarctica.

The Trump administration's environmental policies have raised concern among many. Last month, Mr Trump pledged to end “the war on coal” by cutting “job-killing regulations” and putting miners back to work.

The president also released a $1.1 trillion budget outline last month which includes proposed cuts to the Environmental Protection Agency. Under the plan, the EPA’s budget is to be cut by 31 per cent and some 3,200 staff to lose their jobs.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in