Death penalty in Florida to be reviewed by US Supreme Court
Man who claims intellectual disability and has been sentenced to death has filed an appeal to the US Supreme Court
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Timothy Hurst was convicted in Florida in 1998 of killing his manager at a fast-food restaurant and eventually sentenced to death by a 7-5 vote by the jury, meaning five jurors did not think he should be executed.
Florida is one of two states in the entire US that allows executions in the event of a divided jury, but that could change after the US Supreme Court revealed on Monday that it would review the state’s death penalty. Alabama is the other state that allows divided-jury executions.
The Supreme Court review comes from an appeal filed by Hurst that claims the state of Florida did not consider his intellectual disability in his sentencing and that executions from a divided jury are unconstitutional.
Hurst’s appeal also questions whether juries should decide capital punishment cases when the defendant has a mental disability. Currently in Florida, the jury makes a recommendation to a judge who makes the final decision.
“In the death penalty arena, while a clear majority of states have approved a spectrum of death penalty schemes, Florida remains unique among them in not requiring unanimity of either the finding or recommendation of death or of the aggravating factors that justified that verdict,'' said a petition filed in December by Hurst's attorney. ”It is a position the Florida Supreme Court has recognized, and it is one that court feels ill at ease about.“
In Hurst’s initial sentencing, the jury voted 11-1 to recommend that he be executed and the judge agreed with the recommendation, the Orlando Sentinel reported. Following an appeal in which the defence said Hurst was intellectually disabled, another jury voted 7-5 to recommend the death penalty.
Hurst’s case will be taken up by the Supreme Court at some point during its next term, which starts in October.
Follow @PaytonGuion on Twitter.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments