Cleveland police promise to stop pistol-whipping people
Decree follows damning report about police using firearms as impact weapons
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Police in Cleveland, Ohio will stop hitting people over the head with their guns, following a consent decree between the US Justice Department and Cleveland police released yesterday.
During a two-year investigation that started in 2013, the Justice Department found that police were routinely bashing people on the head with their service pistols, occasionally accidentally firing them.
"[Cleveland Division of Police's] policy will expressly provide that using a firearm as an impact weapon is never an authorized tactic," the consent decree says. "Officers will be trained that use of a firearm as an impact weapon could result in death to suspects, bystanders and themselves."
The legally-binding agreement, which follows months of negotiations with community groups and church leaders, also prohibits officers from brandishing firearms unless they believe lethal force is necessary and requires them to document any time they unholster them.
In light of recent events, it also quite sensibly requires police to train in de-escalate situations verbally rather than approaching suspects with guns drawn.
The 58-page report was incredulous as to why Cleveland police were approaching people with weapons, which also only leaves them with one free hand.
"It is also unclear why CDP appears to be categorizing hitting someone with a gun as a conventional response when force is needed," it said. "This is uniformly understood to be a dangerous practice that should never be permitted except in very unusual and exigent circumstances in which the use of deadly force is authorized; yet, it was a practice we saw CDP officers engaging in too frequently."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments