Bush runs into opposition over security proposals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.President George Bush presented a sweeping plan yesterday to improve domestic security, widen government secrecy and open the way for the military to take a more active role in protecting the US from a "new wave of terrorism that looms in America's future".
The plan, designed to flesh out the duties of the proposed new Department for Homeland Security, calls for special "red teams" of agents whose job would be to test security at likely terrorist targets. It could also draw in up to 1 million workers in sectors such as the postal system, utilities and transport to report any suspected terrorist activity. Meanwhile, documents relating to domestic security would be exempted from public disclosure.
Even so, Mr Bush's plan for the new department, with 170,000 employees and a budget of $38bn (£24bn) a year, is facing an uphill battle on Capitol Hill. Many in Congress, and several outside analysts, believe that what would be the biggest reorganisation of government since president Truman fused four separate armed services into the modern Pentagon in 1947 is too ambitious.
Its hasty announcement last month also looked to critics like an attempt to deflect attention from revelations of intelligence failures before the 11 September terrorist attacks.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments