Uganda court strikes down tough anti-homosexuality law as 'null and void'
People convicted under the Anti-Homosexuality Act faced life imprisonment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Uganda's constitutional court has struck down an anti-homosexuality law punishing gay sex with long jail sentences, on the basis that it was passed during a parliamentary session lacking a quorum.
People convicted under of "aggravated homosexuality” under the Anti-Homosexuality Act faced maximum punishments of life in prison and seven years for "aiding and abetting homosexuality".
Lesbians were also at risk of prosecution under the law for the first time and people found living together in same sex relationships faced life prison sentences.
A day after the law was passed the Ugandan tabloid Red Pepper published the names, and some photographs, of people they claim are homosexuals, alongside the front page headline: “EXPOSED!” on its front page.
The bill was signed in February to a wave of international criticism, and resulted in foreign aid being cut significantly.
Ten petitioners had challenged the anti-gay law after it was enacted in February on the grounds that it was illegally passed and that it violated certain rights guaranteed in Uganda's constitution.
Activists in the packed court room reportedly erupted in loud cheers when the court ruled the law is now "null and void".
The panel of five judges on the East African country's Constitutional Court said the speaker of parliament acted illegally when she allowed a vote on the measure despite at least three objections — including from the country's prime minister — over a lack of a quorum when the bill was passed.
"The speaker was obliged to ensure that there was a quorum," the court said in its ruling. "We come to the conclusion that she acted illegally."
Earlier in July, the Ugandan government released a statement insisting the law had been “misinterpreted” and was not homophobic. It said the law had only been introduced to prevent “open promotion of homosexuality”.
The Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni also defended the law in July, and said aid cuts had actually proved beneficial because they had “aroused” Ugandans to the need to “undertake serious work”.
Dr. Dimitrina Petrova, Executive Director of London-based the Equal Rights Trust, said the organisation was "delighted" at the outcome. The group has been lobbying the Ugandan Parliament and President Museveni on the Anti-Homosexuality Act and Uganda’s treatment of the LGBT community since 2009.
Dr. Dimitrina Petrova said: "As we celebrate this victory, it is important to remember that LGBT people in Uganda continue to suffer profound discrimination and gross inequality, not least through the criminalisation of same-sex sexual activity.
"We will continue to call for greater protection and respect for the rights of LGBT in Uganda, notwithstanding today's decision."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments