South Africa wants retrial for 'Dr Death'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The South African government has asked the Constitutional Court to re-try an apartheid-era germ warfare specialist, nicknamed Dr Death, who has been accused of murdering political opponents under white rule.
Wouter Basson, who earned the epithet for his expertise in developing poisons, avoided prison in 2002 when the High Court in Pretoria acquitted him of 46 charges, including murder, drug trafficking and theft. He had been accused of trying to create "smart" poisons that would affect only blacks, and manufacturing enough cholera and anthrax to start epidemics.
He is also said to have ordered black political prisoners to be tied to trees and smeared with a poisonous gel to see if they would die. If they survived, they were killed by muscle relaxant injections.
He also developed sugar laced with salmonella and anthrax cigarettes. South Africa's chemical and biological warfare programme was the first to have been so publicly exposed and is thought to have been the most lethal of its kind at the time.
The government has spent more than £2m trying to prove Dr Basson's guilt, and it has now taken the case to the Constitutional Court. It argues that Judge Willie Hartzenberg, who presided over the 2002 trial, was biased against the state, and refused to listen to witnesses.
South Africa's Supreme Court rejected an earlier appeal in 2003 but the Constitutional Court later ruled that the government is allowed to argue that the judge was not impartial and that it is entitled to another, fairer trial.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments