Tories mistakenly call for test ban
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NINE Conservative members of the European Parliament have defied government policy and demanded a ban on all nuclear testing, in a motion passed by a huge majority. But it was all a mistake.
The MEPs thought they were voting on South Africa, because interpreters did not have time to translate the motion's title.
The nine Tory MEPs, belonging to the European People's Party, intended to vote against the motion, along with eight of their party who did oppose it. The nine included the group's leader, Sir Christopher Prout, and the Chief Whip, Richard Simmonds. All the other MEPs, apart from two extreme right-wingers from Belgium and Germany, voted in favour of extending the moratorium on testing to include Britain and China.
In a letter to the president of the European Parliament, Mr Simmonds said 'neither I nor any of my colleagues had any intention whatsoever of supporting the latter resolution, which concerned a ban on nuclear testing'. He said the confusion was caused by the 'extreme rapidity with which the votes were taken'.
The letter continued: 'I recognise and support the need to expedite our business but on this occasion I feel that there was insufficient time allowed for interpreters to translate the name of the report.'
The debate on South Africa followed that on nuclear testing. The South African vote was taken immediately, followed by that on the preceding debate. Mr Simmonds said last night that a division in the House of Commons took 17 minutes, whereas at Strasbourg it took less than 17 seconds.
The European Parliament's decisions are not binding, but the size of the majority - 197 to 10 - indicated overwhelming support for a complete ban.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments