Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Harold lost in 1066 because he was 'depressed'

Roger Dobson
Sunday 09 April 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Every schoolchild knows that King Harold lost the Battle of Hastings because he and his army were exhausted after a long march. But now there is another theory. Research suggests that England's last Anglo-Saxon king, a battle-hardened warrior, had been clinically depressed for months before he lost to the Norman invader William in the autumn of 1066. Had he been treated for his illness, Britain, and the world, would be radically different.

Psychologists claim the king plunged into a depression after he was branded a heretic by Rome in March 1066. With no hope of salvation for his soul, say researchers, Harold started to exhibit the behaviour and mood changes associated with depression. "Harold suffered intense feelings of guilt and loss, mainly due to his sense that he was a heretic targeted in a holy war," says Dr Max Sugar, from Tulane University, New Orleans, who led the research. "This meant the loss of his soul and an afterlife. This would account for his inept leadership." An arrow in the eye probably didn't help.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in