Harold lost in 1066 because he was 'depressed'
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
Every schoolchild knows that King Harold lost the Battle of Hastings because he and his army were exhausted after a long march. But now there is another theory. Research suggests that England's last Anglo-Saxon king, a battle-hardened warrior, had been clinically depressed for months before he lost to the Norman invader William in the autumn of 1066. Had he been treated for his illness, Britain, and the world, would be radically different.
Psychologists claim the king plunged into a depression after he was branded a heretic by Rome in March 1066. With no hope of salvation for his soul, say researchers, Harold started to exhibit the behaviour and mood changes associated with depression. "Harold suffered intense feelings of guilt and loss, mainly due to his sense that he was a heretic targeted in a holy war," says Dr Max Sugar, from Tulane University, New Orleans, who led the research. "This meant the loss of his soul and an afterlife. This would account for his inept leadership." An arrow in the eye probably didn't help.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments