Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The richest 1% give everyone else 'quite a good deal', Tory MP says during poverty debate

Chris Heaton-Harris says the rich pay a significant proportion of taxes

Jon Stone
Friday 06 February 2015 11:56 GMT
Comments
How do the rich sleep at night? Very well, according to a major study of British bedtime behaviour
How do the rich sleep at night? Very well, according to a major study of British bedtime behaviour (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The richest 1% give everyone else in Britain “quite a good deal”, a Conservative MP has argued.

Speaking during a parliamentary debate on poverty, Chris Heaton-Harris said his party’s approach to Britain’s wealthiest was a key dividing line with the opposition.

“I guess there will always be a difference in politics between the two sides in this debate—I think that 1% of people paying 30% of income tax is actually quite a good deal for 99% of people, but let us put that to one side,” the MP for Daventry said.

Mr Heaton-Harris went on to argue that it would be too expensive to reverse cuts to social security and tax credits in the face of rising food poverty.

The Coalition government cut the rate of income tax paid by people earning over £150,000 – roughly the top 1% of earners – from 50% to 45%.

Chris Heaton-Harris was speaking in a Westminster Hall debate on poverty
Chris Heaton-Harris was speaking in a Westminster Hall debate on poverty (House of Commons)

At its most extreme, the tax cut meant that the 8,000 people in the UK earning over £1m a year received a tax cut of £100,000 each year. This tax cut in itself is nearly four times the average full time salary.

Mr Heaton-Harris made the remarks during a debate in parliament's Westminster Hall on Wednesday.

Later in the same debate DWP minister Esther McVey echoed Mr Heaton-Harris's argument about the contribution made by the top 1%.

"The top 1% of income tax payers will contribute nearly 30% of this year’s income tax bill. We talk about the richest helping most to get us out of the financial situation in which we found ourselves after Labour left office, and that is what is happening," she said.

Volunteers assemble a selection of tinned food for a client at a food bank depot in Brixton, south London
Volunteers assemble a selection of tinned food for a client at a food bank depot in Brixton, south London (Getty)

The claim that the richest 1% pay around 30% of income tax is correct, according to figures from HMRC.

However, the latest figures from Office for National Statistics also show that the wealthiest 1% have accumulated as much wealth as the poorest 55% of the population put together.

The high tax take from the richest despite a falling top income tax rate is likely to be a reflection of the fact they have been earning much more than other social groups.

The differences in income are also stark. According to analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies published last year, households in the top 1% of earners have incomes six times higher than the average.

The top 1% even earns three times as much as those in the top 10% earners.

Last November the Government dismissed a study which said there was a link between benefit cuts and food bank usage; reductions in social security have also been blamed by researchers for a rise in homelessness and a lack of progress on child poverty reduction.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in