Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government will again ask MPs’ for consent to take military action in Syria despite parliament’s previous rejection of the policy in 2013, the Defence Secretary has said.
Michael Fallon said that the circumstances in the country had changed and that MPs could be made to vote on the issue if the Government could be sure it would win.
“At some point I think the new parliament will have to rethink the absurdity of us being able to strike against Isil in Iraq but not being able to strike Isil’s command and control centres in Syria,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
Asked specifically whether the Government wanted permission to launch attacks on Syria, Mr Fallon replied: “Yes, but to get parliamentary approval we’d have to be absolutely sure that we’d win the vote and establish a sufficient majority for it.
“The circumstances have moved on. That was a motion about tackling Assad. The issue now is whether or not we’re prepared to deal with ISIL.”
In August 2013 Labour MPs joined with Conservative rebels to reject military action against the Assad regime by 285 to 272.
At the time the Prime Minister David Cameron said MPs had clearly rejected strikes and that “the government will act accordingly”.
Later that year Mr Cameron said “Parliament has spoken very clearly” on the issue, adding: “I'm not planning to return to Parliament again to ask again about British military action.
“That doesn't mean we do nothing on Syria, we are already the second largest aid donor in delivering the humanitarian aid that is so badly needed both in Syria, and in the neighbouring countries of Jordan and Turkey.”
In 2013 UK forces would have intervened to attack Syrian government forces under president Assad. Any vote now would likely be to intervene against Isil, also known as Islamic State, who are fighting against the Assad government.
British warplanes are currently attacking Isil forces in Iraq but do not have permission to strike Syria.
The Government however yesterday revealed that RAF drones had killed two British national militants in Syria. Mr Cameron told Parliament that Reyaad Khan and Ruhul Amin died in a drone strike near Raqqa, Syria on 21 August 2015.
"We did warn last year that where there was a national interest at stake, where there was a security risk, then we would take action and explain to parliament afterwards," Mr Fallon explained today.
"I wouldn’t hesitate to do it again. If we know an armed attack is likely then we have to do something about it."
In July the Government revealed that British pilots embedded in foreign airforces had been taking part in airstrikes in Syria, however.
"When embedded, UK personnel are effectively operating as foreign troops," the Ministry of Defence argued at the time.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments