Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Syria air stirkes: MoD disputed David Cameron's claim there are 70,000 moderate rebels

Reports claim senior defence staff described the number as 'misleading' and too high, based on reports from intelligence officers based in Lebanon

Ian Johnston
Friday 04 December 2015 01:26 GMT
Comments
David Cameron leaves 10 Downing Street ahead of the debate and vote in the House of Commons on joining the bombing campaign against the Islamic State group in Syria
David Cameron leaves 10 Downing Street ahead of the debate and vote in the House of Commons on joining the bombing campaign against the Islamic State group in Syria (AFP/Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Ministry of Defence reportedly asked for the controversial claim that there are 70,000 moderate rebels in Syria to be removed from the Prime Minister’s statement to MPs in which he made the case for air strikes on Isis.

The Sun newspaper, citing a Whitehall source, reported that senior defence staff had described the number as “misleading” and too high, based on reports from intelligence officers based in Lebanon.

However, their views were over-ruled during discussions at a meeting of the Joint Intelligence Committee, which includes the heads of MI6, MI5 and GCHQ along with senior military and Foreign Office staff.

The claim that there were 70,000 moderate rebel fighters in Syria was key, as it suggested there was a force big enough to perform the “boots-on-the-ground” role in the war against Isis and British troops would not be required.

The Whitehall source compared the figure to Tony Blair’s “dodgy dossier”, which made the case for the 2003 invasion of Iraq and which wrongly said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction that could be deployed within 45 minutes.

“It’s got 45 minutes written all over it. [David] Cameron didn’t think this through,” the source told The Sun.

“If he really didn’t know about the MoD’s worries, he should have asked more questions about it.”

The picture in Syria is confused with a number of different groups fighting local conflicts. In some places moderates are allied with Islamists against President Bashar Assad’s forces, while in other areas the same groups are fighting each other.

And it is further complicated by some fighters pretending to be Islamists in order to get better weapons and funding and non-Islamists joining extremist groups, again because they tend to be better equipped.

Mr Cameron told the Commons on Wednesday that “the majority” of the 70,000 moderate fighters he had referred to previously were members of a leading rebel group, the Free Syrian Army.

He said he was “not arguing that all of these 70,000 are ideal partners” but were “people we can work with”.

In a statement, a Downing Street spokeswoman did not deny the report but said the MoD had not raised any concerns directly with the Prime Minister’s office.

“The 70,000 figure was produced by the Joint Intelligence Committee, which includes in its membership officials from the Ministry of Defence,” it said.

“The Ministry of Defence did not raise concerns with No 10 on whether this figure should be included in the PM's response to the Foreign Affairs Committee.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in