Stripping Cable of Sky ruling cost £300,000
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The decision to transfer responsibility between government departments for deciding if Rupert Murdoch's bid for BSkyB should be referred to the Competition Commission cost the taxpayer £300,000.
David Cameron ordered responsibility for media competition be taken away from Business Secretary Vince Cable after the minister was recorded by an undercover reporter claiming he had "decalred war" on the media mogul's empire. The role was shifted to Jeremy Hunt, the Culture Secretary.
The cost of the move was calculated to have cost £280,000 in alterations to IT systems and connections, while moving staff and materials added a further £20,000. The expense caused by the Business Secretary's gaffe was revealed after the BBC issued a Freedom of Information request. A government spokesman said the transfer was being "handled as cost-effectively as possible".
Mr Murdoch's News Corp already owns 39 per cent of BSkyB and said last year that it wants to buy the remainder of the broadcaster. The bid has sparked protests from other media organisations which believe the move would give Mr Murdoch's empire an excessive share of the UK market.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments