Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Soldiers 'must learn difference between right and wrong'

Kim Sengupta
Saturday 26 January 2008 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A new inquiry should be launched into the death of Baha Mousa, the Iraqi prisoner who suffered horrific injuries in British Army custody, the senior officer tasked with examining abuse by UK soldiers has said.

A report produced by Brigadier Robert Aitken said that serious flaws in the preparation of troops for dealing with prisoners were to blame for brutality against civilians in Iraq. British soldiers, it said, needed to be given "a better understanding between right and wrong".

As the report was published, Des Browne, the Defence Secretary, announced that a review had concluded that "no further criminal lines of inquiry" would be pursued in the case of Mr Mousa, 26, who died with 93 wounds to his body.

But Brigadier Aitken, who was appointed by the then head of the Army, General Sir Mike Jackson, to carry out the review, said: "This does not mean that the incident is now closed. There has clearly been a breach of the Army's professional standards as a result of which a man died in the most appalling circumstances. We need to get to the bottom of it, and that will involve a further inquiry. The Defence Secretary is still considering what form that inquiry will take."

The Defence Secretary's office later confirmed that Mr Browne was prepared to look into holding a further inquiry into the case and senior military officials said "administrative action" could subsequently be taken against certain individuals, including those who have not yet been arrested over the killing in Basra in 2003.

Brigadier Aitken insisted there was no evidence of systematic and endemic abuse by British forces in the aftermath of the invasion of Iraq. The vast majority of the courts martial of soldiers for the killing of Iraqi civilians had resulted in acquittals.

Col Jorge Mendonca, who became the highest-ranking British officer to be charged in an abuse case when he was accused of war crimes over the death of Mr Mousa, said yesterday: "The fact that there were failures in Iraq is a direct consequence of too few troops being deployed to an impossible situation without the correct support, resources or plan. None of that is addressed in the report, which I find deeply disappointing. If you send a small group of soldiers into a difficult situation it seems to be pretty rich to then expect everything to go swimmingly and then blame a few commanders on the ground when things go wrong."

But Brigadier Aitken said lack of numbers was no excuse for some of the brutal acts that took place. "I don't buy that," he said. "Criminal activity is criminal activity. Disgraceful behaviour is disgraceful behaviour. That does not change. We have to teach soldiers that loyalty does not mean protecting your mates when the service police come asking questions. Courage does not mean just physical courage in battle it also means moral courage to stand up against injustice."

General Sir Richard Dannatt, head of the Army, said: "The British Army has performed [to] the highest standards under extraordinary testing conditions in Iraq. But I take no pride in the conduct of a very small number of our people who deliberately abused Iraqi civilians ... The report is rightly critical of our performances in a number of steps we have already taken towards ensuring that such behaviour is not repeated."

In Basra, Mr Mousa's father, Daoud, a former colonel in the Iraqi army, said: "As a senior officer in the Iraqi army, I am clear that these terrible actions could not have taken place without support from senior officers within the British Army. They either knew or ought to have known what was happening. Either way, I hold them to account for what happened to my son. I do not accept this report for a moment."

Tim Hancock, campaigns director of Amnesty International UK, said any further inquiry must be fully independent. "Today's report is no substitute for such an inquiry. We would like to see Mr Mousa's family fully involved in a proper investigation to finally lay this matter to rest."

The tragic case of Baha Mousa

* September 2003

Baha Mousa dies while in British Army custody.

* October 2003

An investigation begins by the Special Investigation Branch of the Royal Military Police.

* June 2004

Armed Forces minister Adam Ingram says the investigation into the death is complete.

* March 2005

Brigadier Robert Aitken asks commanders in Iraq for information about prisoner abuse.

* July 2005

Colonel Jorge Mendonca and six others are charged in connection with the death of Baha Mousa.

* March 2007

The court martial ends with the acquittal of all defendants.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in