Sir Ivan Rogers quits: EU ambassador attacks 'muddled thinking' over Brexit in resignation letter
Sir Ivan urges civil servants to 'never be afraid to speak the truth to those in power'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The UK’s ambassador to the European Union attacked the Government’s “muddled thinking” over Brexit as he resigned, a leaked message to staff has revealed.
In his shock resignation letter, Sir Ivan Rogers revealed civil servants still faced uncertainty over the Government’s Brexit plans and urged his colleagues to challenge “ill-founded arguments”.
Sir Ivan, who has been the UK’s top ambassador to the EU for three years, resigned with weeks to go before Theresa May was due to trigger the process of leaving the 28-nation bloc.
“I hope you will continue to challenge ill-founded arguments and muddled thinking and that you will never be afraid to speak the truth to those in power,” he wrote.
“I hope that you will support each other in those difficult moments where you have to deliver messages that are disagreeable to those who need to hear them.”
Sir Ivan unexpectedly quit just months after he sparked controversy by warning the Government that a post-Brexit trade deal could take a decade to finalise, and even then may fail to get ratified by member states.
The ambassador, who was expected to continue in his role until October, said he had done all he could to contribute his experience, expertise and contacts to the team responsible for invoking Article 50 and overseeing Brexit negotiations.
“I know that this news will add, temporarily, to the uncertainty that I know, from our many discussions in the autumn, you are all feeling about the role of UKREP [the UK Representation to the EU] in the coming months and years of negotiations over ‘Brexit’,” he wrote.
“I am sorry about that, but I hope that it will help produce earlier and greater clarity on the role that UKREP should play.”
Former Ukip leader and Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage said Sir Ivan should have stepped down the day after referendum and he hoped his resignation was the start of a “real political revolution”.
“I think we should get rid of many of our ambassadors around the world,” he said on his LBC radio show.
The former permanent secretary to the Treasury called Sir Ivan’s resignation a “wilful and total destruction” of expertise amid fears he has been “hounded out” by hostile pro-Brexiteers.
Nicholas Macpherson said the ambassador was the latest in a worrying line of experienced figures to walk away.
“Ivan Rogers huge loss. Can’t understand wilful and total destruction of EU expertise,” he wrote.
Sir Ivan said unlike in Brussels, “serious multilateral negotiating experience is in short supply in Whitehall”.
“The government will only achieve the best for the country if it harnesses the best experience we have – a large proportion of which is concentrated in UKREP – and negotiates resolutely.”
He also appeared to criticise views held by politicians, writing: “Contrary to the beliefs of some, free trade does not just happen when it is not thwarted by authorities”.
“Increasing market access to other markets and consumer choice in our own, depends on the deals, multilateral, plurilateral and bilateral that we strike, and the terms that we agree.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments