Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

British MPs went on 53 foreign trips paid for by despotic regimes last year

Chief amongst donors were Qatar and Saudi Arabia

Jon Stone
Political Correspondent
Monday 06 February 2017 21:18 GMT
Comments
Qatari army special forces take part in a military parade. Qatar was the biggest of the 'not free' donor countries.
Qatari army special forces take part in a military parade. Qatar was the biggest of the 'not free' donor countries. (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

British MPs accepted tens of thousands of pounds in hospitality from despotic regimes last year, an analysis of Parliament’s register of interest shows.

Politicians from across all the main parties registered a total of £172,561 worth of flights, hotels, and other similar gifts from countries widely considered “not free” in 2016.

The 53 separate payments in kind were typically for “fact-finding” missions arranged and funded by the host regimes. 41 junkets were accepted by Conservative MPs, seven by Labour MPs, four by SNP MPs, and one by a Liberal Democrat.

A total of eight separate countries with autocratic governments provided such gifts: Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates.

The biggest single donor country was Qatar, an apparent sign of the country ramping up its lobbying and propaganda campaigns ahead of its hosting of the 2022 FIFA World Cup.

The Middle East state, which is governed by sharia law, flogs women who have illicit sex and by law imprisons people who preach any religion other than Islam. It is governed by an absolute monarchy and has constitution based on sharia law.

The US State Department says foreign workers are routinely subject to forced labour in Qatar, sometimes including prostitution, having had their passports confiscated. Such labour is reportedly being used to construct stadia for the coming World Cup.

Close behind Qatar the second biggest donor country is Saudi Arabia. The British government has continued to sign off billions in arms sales to the autocratic petro-state despite widespread reports of that is committing war crimes in its military campaign in Yemen.

This week the High Court will hear a case brought by arms control campaigners calling for a halt to the arms sales to the regime. MPs on the Arms Export Control Committee were previously split on whether the Government should stop the sales..

Andrew Smith of Campaign Against Arms Trade said: “MPs should not be taking hospitality from regimes with appalling human rights records. This is lobbying plain and simple. These despots aren’t paying for transport and flashy hotels because they’re nice people, they’re doing it because they want to win friends and buy influence.”

The Bahraini government reportedly used live ammunition to repress demonstrations (Getty)
The Bahraini government reportedly used live ammunition to repress demonstrations (Getty) (Getty Images)

“At a time when UK bombs are creating a humanitarian catastrophe in Yemen, it is time for a total overhaul in UK foreign policy, not for closer relationships with dictatorships and human rights abusers.”

Some MPs have previously defended going on such trips, stating that engagement with countries with poor records would help bring about political change.

Donations either came from branches of government or in two cases, organisations with very close links to their respective governments. Countries that were listed “not free” by US NGO Freedom House were considered not free for this analysis, which was conducted jointly by The Independent and Campaign Against the Arms Trade.

The Egyptian military regime locked up a number of al-Jazeera journalists, promping protests worldwide
The Egyptian military regime locked up a number of al-Jazeera journalists, promping protests worldwide (AFP / Getty Images)

Donations from Saudi Arabia came from the country’s Ministry for Foreign Affairs, as did donations from Qatar and Bahrain. Donations from Egypt came from a mix of its ministry of foreign affairs and its Parliament.

Donations from Kazakhstan came directly from the country’s Government. Donations from Jordan came from the country’s parliament.

Donations from Azerbaijan came from the country’s embassy and an organisation called The European Azerbaijan Society, which is headed by the son of a powerful government minister.

Donations from the UAE came from its ministry of foreign affairs, and in some cases from Falcon Associates, which says it works on behalf of the Dubai leadership and whose honorary president is a government minister.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in