Privacy fears as police cleared over bugging
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Ministers faced anger over the advance of Britain's "surveillance society" as an official report confirmed that police had bugged a the private conversations of a Labour MP.
The report, conducted by Sir Christopher Rose, the chief surveillance officer, confirmed that five junior officers who monitored two meetings between Sadiq Khan and one of his constituents had done so knowing he was an MP.
But they had received proper authorisation to listen in and did not breach the legislation controlling surveillance operations, the report concluded. Mr Khan was recorded by a bug hidden in a desk when he visited the terrorist suspect Babar Ahmad in Woodhill jail, Milton Keynes, in May 2005 and June 2006.
MPs expressed concern that the "Wilson doctrine", which forbids the tapping of MPs' telephones, had been flouted.
Dominic Grieve, the shadow Attorney General, said: "This also raises wider issues about the extent to which we now have a level of surveillance society where a very large number of areas of intrusive investigation are being authorised by police officers at a senior level but carried out and monitored by police officers at a very junior level."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments