Peers drop equality bill challenge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Peers today dropped a challenge to the lifting of a ban on gays and lesbians holding civil partnership ceremonies in churches.
Conservative Baroness O'Cathain had urged that regulations allowing the registration of civil partnerships in religious buildings should be annulled due to legal doubts over their effect.
But she withdrew the challenge after assurances from Home Office minister Lord Henley that the provisions were "entirely permissive" and did not force faith groups to hold ceremonies if they did not want to do so.
Peers voted last year to lift the ban on gays and lesbians holding civil partnership ceremonies in churches.
The amendment to the Equality Bill was moved then by openly gay Labour peer Lord Alli, who today hit out at the "misinformation peddled" by those now seeking to block the move.
In an impassioned debate, Lady O'Cathain warned the regulations allowing the change were "fatally flawed".
Although they do not compel religious organisations to host the registration of civil partnerships, she claimed equality laws could leave them open to legal challenge.
Lady O'Cathain said she did not doubt the Government's intention to create an "entirely voluntary system" but lawyers advised equality laws could leave churches which choose not to host gay and lesbian ceremonies open to "legal pressure".
She told a packed House of Lords: "In no way am I trying to block these regulations as a means of opposing civil partnerships."
Despite receiving many "obnoxious letters" impugning her motives, she insisted: "I have no hidden agenda. My sole reason is to stop churches having their religious freedoms taken away by local authority or litigious activists."
PA
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments