Peers defeat Government on church gay ban
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Peers tonight defeated the Government on plans that churches argued would restrict their ability to deny jobs to gay people and transsexuals.
The Government insisted provisions in the Equality Bill would maintain the status quo, but church leaders, including the Archbishop of York, argued that it would create confusion.
Peers voted by 216 to 178, majority 38, to strike out a section of the Bill which campaigners argued had been too narrowly drawn.
Both sides argued that their solution would maintain the current position, which allows religious organisations to discriminate against some applicants on conscientious grounds, but the Government said the change in the Bill was needed to clarify the situation.
The Archbishop of York, the Most Reverend John Sentamu, told peers: "You may feel that many churches and other religious organisations are wrong on matters of sexual ethics.
"But, if religious freedom means anything it must mean that those are matters for the churches and other religious organisations to determine for themselves in accordance with their own convictions."
He added: "Where are the examples of actual abuses that have caused difficulties? Where are the court rulings that have shown that the law is defective? If it ain't broke, why fix it?"
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments