Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Government scraps Pay To Stay plan to raise rents on higher income council tenants

The policy was reviewed over the summer

Jon Stone
Political Correspondent
Monday 21 November 2016 18:52 GMT
Comments
Higher-earning council tenants would have seen their rents raised
Higher-earning council tenants would have seen their rents raised (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government has scrapped its plans to raise rents for council tenants with higher incomes.

Housing minister Gavin Barwell announced that the so-called “Pay to stay” policy had been reviewed over the summer and would not be compulsory.

“Since the summer, the Government has been reviewing this policy,” he said in a written statement.

“We have listened carefully to the views of tenants, local authorities and others and as a result, we have decided not to proceed with a compulsory approach.”

Mr Barwell said local councils would be allowed to impose the policy voluntarily. Local councils have however been among those calling for the policy to be scrapped or rethought.

Additionally, local councils already have the power to implement pay-to-stay voluntarily and none have yet done so.

Labour's shadow housing minister John Healey welcomed the U-turn and said the Government should now rethink the rest of its housing policies.

Under the policy tenant households with an income higher than £31,000 or £40,000 in London would be forced to pay rents that were close to the market rent.

This means a working couple on £15,500 each outside of London would be defined as high-income.

About 70,000 social tenants were set to lose about £1,000 a year from the policy.

The policy was expected to raise just £75m annually, according to the latest estimates by Whitehall officials.

Mr Barwell continued: “The Government remains committed to delivering its objective of ensuring social housing is occupied by those who need it most.

“But we need to do so in a way that supports those ordinary working class families who can struggle to get by, and in a way which delivers real savings to the taxpayer.

“The policy as previously envisaged did not meet those aims.”

The Government also today confirmed it would press ahead with plans to force councils to give their tenants fixed-term tenancy agreements.

The shadow minister Mr Healey said: “This welcome U-turn is a victory for Labour’s year-long campaign against the ‘tenant tax’ which was set to hike rents for thousands of middle income households.

“Having recognised this move was a big mistake, ministers must now rethink the rest of their failed housing decisions over the last six years.

“After disastrous figures last week showing that the number of new affordable homes for social rent has fallen to the lowest level since records began, top of the list must be reversing the forced sale of vital council homes and the huge cuts to investment in new genuinely affordable homes.”

Campbell Robb, chief executive of housing charity Shelter, said: “It’s encouraging that the government has responded to concerns and decided to scrap compulsory pay to stay.

“Rather than implement a costly policy that would have tied councils up in piles of expensive and bureaucratic red tape, the government is now able to focus on what really matters: building homes that ordinary people can actually afford to rent and buy.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in