Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Panorama' on single mothers 'misleading'

Maggie Brown,Media Editor
Wednesday 20 July 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PANORAMA, the BBC current affairs programme, has been criticised by the Broadcasting Complaints Commission for screening a flawed programme about single mothers, called Babies on Benefit, writes Maggie Brown.

The programme was screened last September at the height of the Government's attack on single mothers. Babies on Benefit was immediately seized upon by Conservative MPs as proof that young women were allegedly becoming pregnant to jump housing queues and gain extra state handouts. But the commission's adjudication says the programme was misleading and unfair. It had failed to distinguish between young single mothers and others such as divorced and deserted women. It was also irresponsible, by using unverified data from a new scheme in New Jersey that purported to show that capping hand- outs halved the birth rate among young, single women.

The BBC is still considering the text of an apology which the commission requires it to broadcast. The case, which has taken a year to conclude, is so sensitive that BBC lawyers are seeking advice about a judicial review.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in