Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

One million Commonwealth citizens 'should lose the right to vote in UK'

Campaign group says figures compiled for first time show potential impact on 2015 general elections from a legal 'hangover from the days of Empire'

Adam Withnall
Wednesday 28 August 2013 11:39 BST
Comments
Voting rights should be taken away from Commonwealth citizens living in the UK, campaigners argue
Voting rights should be taken away from Commonwealth citizens living in the UK, campaigners argue (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Around one million Commonwealth citizens will be allowed to vote in the next general election despite not having qualified for British citizenship, in a practice that “should be brought to an end immediately”, a report has argued.

Immigrants from 54 independent sovereign states, including Australia, Canada and India, can reportedly register to vote upon arrival in the UK, despite the fact that their countries do not offer similar rights to British emigrants.

The campaign group Migration Watch UK compiled a report into the laws, and in doing so put together figures for the first time that show the impact Commonwealth voters could have in national elections.

In one example the report said a student visitor to Britain from a qualifying Commonwealth country, who only plans to stay to study for six months, would nonetheless have the same rights as a resident citizen to vote in a parliamentary election.

And while a number of countries, like the Republic of Ireland, offer reciprocal rights to vote for British citizens, for those who do not it is an “issue of basic fairness” and “a hangover from the days of Empire”, according to the group.

The Migration Watch chairman Sir Andrew Green said: “If the next election is close, and especially if there is a coalition negotiation, the outcome could be significantly influenced by a group of people who have not yet qualified to become British citizens or have not even bothered to do so.

“If people want to participate in deciding the future of our country they should at least become citizens.

“The public will be astonished to learn that nearly a million foreign citizens from countries that do not allow British residents to vote in their countries are, nevertheless, allowed to vote in all British elections.

“In future, it should be reciprocal. Except for nationals of a handful of Commonwealth countries that grant similar rights, it should be brought to an end immediately,” Sir Andrew said.

The report comes after the previous government commissioned a review of British citizenship laws in 2007 by Lord Goldsmith, the then Attorney General.

But successive governments have chosen not to act on the review’s recommendation that ministers makes a “clear connection between citizenship and the right to vote”.

And in response to Migration Watch’s report, a Cabinet Office spokesman said: “The right to vote in UK elections for Commonwealth citizens who live here reflects our close historical ties with Commonwealth countries.

”Excluding Commonwealth citizens would be a significant step and would require careful consideration.

“Parliament has previously taken the view that these rights should not be changed.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in