Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Hundreds of patient medical records have been sold to private companies, according to a damning new report that concludes the NHS has made “significant lapses” in the handling of patient data.
The review into data handling, released by the NHS Information Centre (NHS IC), found patients’ data could have been used “improperly” due to a failure to implement data-sharing arrangements.
The review, chaired by Sir Nicholas Partridge, the group’s non-executive director, suggests there were 588 “data releases” to private sector firms between 2005 and 2013, with medical information passed to pharmaceutical companies, insurance providers and data analysts. Although information did not name patients, in some cases it would have been possible to identify people through the information provided.
The review found there were “significant administrative lapses” in recording the release of data. In some cases the decision-making process as to why the data was released was “unclear” and records of decisions incomplete. “It disappoints me to report that the review has discovered lapses in the strict arrangements that were supposed to be in place to ensure that people’s personal data would never be used improperly,” the review stated.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments