MPs' expenses 'still a mess'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Ministers faced accusations of presiding over a "shambles" last night as they insisted they remained committed to overhauling the MPs' expenses system. They were surprised by protests that the Queen's Speech contained no fresh proposals for reforming Commons expenses.
The complaints were led by Sir Christopher Kelly, the anti-sleaze watchdog, who said he was "disappointed" by the omission. He listed 10 measures he believes need to be passed into law before the general election to ensure his reform plans are implemented in full.
Harriet Harman, the Commons leader, said she was willing to hold talks with opposition parties if they believed new laws were needed to complete the clean-up of Members' pay and perks. But she cast doubt on whether Sir Christopher's recommended ban on MPs employing their relatives needed legislation to come into effect.
A Conservative spokesman said: "It's another shambles and shows that on expenses reform Gordon Brown still does not get it."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments