Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ministers fight free bus pass for men at 60

Sophie Goodchild
Sunday 15 October 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government is facing a court battle over its refusal to give free bus passes to men aged 60 and over.

The Government is facing a court battle over its refusal to give free bus passes to men aged 60 and over.

At present, women get free passes from 60 in some areas, and men must wait until they are 65, though rail companies offer discounted fares to men 60 and over as senior citizens.

Christopher Spindlow, a 60-year-old Londoner, says the bus pass anomaly contravenes European regulations and breaches Article 14 of the Human Rights Act by discriminating against men. Mr Spindlow is backed by Parity, the equal rights pressure group, which has retained Lovells, the City law firm.

The group has won high-profile victories over the Government on sex discrimination, including winter fuel payments and free prescriptions for men and women at 60. In both cases, the Government claimed linking the benefit to the pensionable age was right, but the European Court rejected this.

Different age limits for men and women on pensions have remained unchanged since 1947. John Mays, chairman of Parity, said a victory would also ensure environmental benefits, because car use would be reduced.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in