Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Military 'should have preferential NHS treatment'

Ben Russell,Political Correspondent
Wednesday 25 June 2008 00:00 BST
Comments
The coffin of Private Charles David Murray is carried by colleagues athis funeral
The coffin of Private Charles David Murray is carried by colleagues athis funeral (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Military families should get preferential access to public services such as the NHS, schools and dentistry under proposals backed by the head of Britain's armed forces.

Sir Jock Stirrup, the Chief of Defence Staff, said that families of servicemen and women should "get a little bit more" because of the sacrifices they make for the nation. He is negotiating with Gordon Brown and Des Browne, the Defence Secretary, to secure a "level playing field" for military families as part of a new strategy on personnel due to be published in the next few weeks.

But in comments yesterday that will pile pressure on Gordon Brown to offer a better deal to service families, Sir Jock said many people lost out as they were unable to maintain places on hospital waiting lists or get their children a place at local schools if they were moved around the country.

He said: "My objective is to see as an absolute starting point that there is a level playing field for our people. But then from my perspective that there should be a little bit more. That actually they should be treated a little bit better because of the service they give to their country and the sacrifices they make for the country."

Sir Jock added: "In all of this there are opportunities to make life just a little bit better for our people. I don't want to go into the details of how one might do this but there are ideas out there which are not massively expensive, which are not to the detriment of other people in society, but they are just another reflection of the country saying we recognise that you give up a lot compared to other citizens and because of that, here is this good deal."

Sir Jock used a speech at Westminster to warn that bread-and-butter issues of public services ranked among the greatest concerns of military families.

He said: "They are about access to dentists when they move home, access to doctors, getting their children into decent schools when they are posted to different areas. They are about making sure they get the same level of service from society that everyone else gets. At the moment the families are disadvantaged by their spouses' service."

Last week the Conservatives proposed giving service families guarantees of a place on dentists' lists even if they were full, and offering them a pledge that they would not lose their place on NHS waiting lists if posted elsewhere.

Yesterday Liam Fox, the shadow Defence Secretary, backed Sir Jock's comments. He said: "This government must ensure they treat our armed forces and their families with the respect they deserve. To date this has not been the case."

But Nick Harvey, the Liberal Democrat defence spokesman, said there was a case at looking at the "unique circumstances" but was not convinced about "across the board preferential treatment".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in