Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Made up money' padding aid budget, critics claim

 

Andy McSmith
Friday 30 December 2011 01:00 GMT
Comments
Andrew Mitchell, the International Development Secretary, is using debt cancellation as a form of aid
Andrew Mitchell, the International Development Secretary, is using debt cancellation as a form of aid (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Britain has been accused of padding its aid budget with "made up money" so it can claim to have met its millennium promise of increasing the amount it donates to the world's poorest people.

The Department for International Development, headed by Andrew Mitchell, has confirmed that cancelling the debts of some of the world's poorest countries will count towards the aid total, helping the UK to achieve its millennium target of spending 0.7 per cent of national income on overseas aid by 2014.

One of the most controversial debts is the millions that the Sudanese nominally owes for weapons purchased during the Cold War. The money was loaned in the late 1970s by an agency of what is now the Department for Business, at interest rates of 10-12 per cent per year, which have added £405m to the original £173m loan, bringing it to £678m.

The Government is no longer able to say what this money was used to buy. Earlier this year, the Labour MP Lisa Nandy asked questions in Parliament about what the original loans were for, and was told the records have been lost.

But in the late 1970s, the west was arming Sudan as a counterweight to the Marxist regime in neighbouring Ethiopia, which was backed by the Soviet Union, because of fears that communist influence in the Horn of Africa could threaten oil supplies.

The arms sales ended around the time when Sudan descended into civil war between the predominantly Muslim Arab north and the Christian, African south. There have been no repayments on the loans since 1984. The debt is expected to be cancelled in 2013-14, a formality which will instantly add 7 per cent to the UK's nominal aid budget.

Tim Jones, the senior policy officer at the Jubilee Debt Campaign, said: "The debt comes from loans to win business for Britain in the Cold War. Most of the debt is made-up money based on ridiculously high interest rates. It should be cancelled because it is unjust and unpayable, not used to meet targets and massage figures."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in