Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Local councils abuse anti-social behaviour powers, campaigners warn

Exclusive: PSPOs can ban anything deemed a persistent nuisance, with penalties including court fines up to £1,000

Jonathan Owen
Thursday 11 February 2016 23:19 GMT
Comments
There is concern that PSPOs are being misused, and penalising the wrong people
There is concern that PSPOs are being misused, and penalising the wrong people (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Councils across the country are abusing powers aimed at preventing anti-social behaviours, using them against people ranging from dog walkers to buskers, campaigners have warned Home Office minister Lord Ahmad.

Public Space Protection Orders (PSPOs) can be used to ban anything deemed to be a persistent nuisance, with penalties including court fines of up to £1,000.

But there is mounting concern over the way the orders, which apply to England and Wales, are being used.

In the latest of a series of controversies, it emerged last week that under a PSPO by Havering Council, London, parents could be fined if deemed to be parking dangerously while dropping off their children at school.

“Local authorities are throwing these things around like confetti,” Liberal Democrat peer Lord Clement-Jones told The Independent.

He has written a letter to Lord Ahmad, which is signed by seven organisations including Liberty, the Kennel Club, and the Musician’s Union.

The Government’s guidance says that the orders should not be used to ban reasonable activities.

“But the consensus of those monitoring PSPO enforcement, and many of those at the sharp end, is that the statutory guidance is not sufficiently clear and is not preventing the inappropriate use of these powers to restrict reasonable activities,” the letter says.

And PSPOs are being used “without any prior evidence of significant harm,” it states.

Theresa May, the Home Secretary, should warn local authorities against misusing the powers, and meet with campaigners to strengthen the existing guidance, says the letter.

The Home Office does not comment on private correspondence. But a spokesman for the Local Government Association said: “Public Space Protection Orders can be used to address anti-social activities in public spaces, which are having a detrimental effect on the quality of life of local people.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in