'Like being in a kind of bag’: Tory minister Ken Clarke weighs in on wearing veil in court
Former Justice Secretary wades into debate on women wearing the veil in court, adding that ‘it’s a most peculiar costume for 21st century’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A senior Tory minister has said that women should not be allowed to give evidence while wearing the veil in court because they are “in a kind of bag”.
Ken Clarke, the former Justice Secretary and a barrister by profession, added that he thinks “it's a most peculiar costume for people to adopt in the 21st century”.
Now a minister without portfolio, Mr Clarke made the comments while speaking on Radio 4’s World This Weekend. It comes in the wake of a widespread debate on Muslim women’s right to wear the veil in public institutions and after a judge ruled that a female defendant could not give evidence while doing so.
The 73-year-old, widely regarding as among the more liberal members of the Conservative party, said that body language plays an important role in allowing jurors to decide whether or not a witness is telling the truth.
He said he could not see how this was possible “when they are facing somebody who is veiled”.
Mr Clarke said he agreed with Theresa May’s comments that it is not the Government’s place to tell women what they can and cannot wear, but said that a judge and jury “have got to be able to see the face of the witness”.
“I don't think a witness should be allowed to give evidence from behind a veil,” he said.
“It's almost impossible to have a proper trial if one of the persons (is) in a kind of bag.
“It's a most peculiar costume for people to adopt in the 21st century,” he added.
Mr Clarke echoed judges’ calls for a “clear rule” for courts but insisted his comments were “not based on any trace of Islamophobia”.
It is not the first time Mr Clarke has come out with controversial comments on a difficult issue. He was forced to apologise and admitted that he had chosen his words “very, very badly” in May 2011 when he suggested that some rapes were less serious than others.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments