Jeremy Corbyn Virgin Trains row: Probe launched into possible data protection rule breach over CCTV footage release
Exclusive: Data watchdog says release of footage should usually only be carried out by law enforcement agencies
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Information Commissioner is looking into a possible breach of data protection rules after Richard Branson's Virgin Trains released CCTV footage of Jeremy Corbyn, in order to rebut his claims their service was "ram-packed".
The railway company released video and still images from one of its trains to show there were empty seats after Mr Corbyn complained of overcrowding.
Virgin published the timestamped pictures alongside a statement chiding Mr Corbyn, who had suggested that sitting on the floor was “a problem that many passengers face every day”.
One image initially released by the company had the faces of some other passengers visible; this was later withdrawn and replaced with a blurred version. Mr Corbyn was identified in all images and his face never blurred, however.
A spokesperson for the Information Commissioner’s Office told The Independent it was looking into the incident and that organisations should be aware of their legal responsibilities under the Data Protection Act.
“We are aware of the publication of CCTV images of Jeremy Corbyn and are making enquiries,” she said.
“All organisations have an obligation to comply with the Data Protection Act and must have legitimate grounds for processing the personal data they hold.
“Where there’s a suggestion that this hasn’t happened, the ICO has the power to investigate and can take enforcement action if necessary.”
Virgin Trains’ privacy policy has a section on CCTV in which is notes it must comply with data protection laws.
“In certain circumstances we may need to disclose CCTV images for legal reasons, the policy states.
“When this is done there is a requirement for the organisation that has received the images to adhere to the Data Protection Act.”
The Information Commissioner Office’s 2015 guidance on how not to break data protection law with a CCTV system warns against posting images on the internet or giving them to the media.
“It can be appropriate to disclose surveillance information to a law enforcement agency when the purpose of the system is to prevent and detect crime, but it would not be appropriate to place them on the internet in most situations,” the guidance states.
“It may also not be appropriate to disclose information about identifiable individuals to the media.”
It adds that release to the public “should not generally be done by anyone other than a law enforcement agency”.
In “severe cases” enforcement action would be launched by the Information Commissioner, it says.
Virgin Trains declined to comment, though a spokesperson indicated the firm was mindful of its obligations with regard to the Data Protection Act and pointed out it had pixelated passengers' faces.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments