Hounded out: Lib Dems veto Tory plan to relax hunting laws
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Liberal Democrats have blocked a plan backed by David Cameron to relax the ban on hunting introduced in 2004.
The Prime Minister expressed his regret that the two Coalition parties were unlikely to agree about a proposal to allow up to 40 dogs to flush out a fox, instead of the two dogs allowed under the Hunting Act.
It has been put forward by hill farmers to help them control foxes and won the support of pro-hunting MPs. But Liberal Democrat sources said they had blocked a move that would have restored hunting with packs of dogs “by the back door”.
Mr Cameron said during Prime Minister’s Questions: “Proposals were made on a cross-party basis about an amendment to the Hunting Act that would help in particular upland farmers deal with the problem of fox predation of their lands. That letter has been received and is being considered but I regret to say I don't think there'll be government agreement to go forward."
There is also no sign of the free Commons vote on whether to retain the hunting ban, which was promised in the Coalition Agreement struck in 2010. Conservative sources admit that pro-hunting MPs are not pressing for a vote because they fear calls for a relaxation would be defeated.
Downing Street insisted that the pledge of a free vote still stood and there was no change in the policy set out in the agreement. But it could not give a timetable for the vote.
Joe Duckworth, chief executive of the League Against Cruel Sports, said: “I am delighted that we have flushed out this back door attack on the Hunting Act. What they planned would have driven a coach and horses through the Act. I am delighted we have thwarted this plot from a tiny but powerful hunting lobby. We have won this battle but not the war. We call on the Prime Minister to either admit the Hunting Act is here to stay, or hold the promised vote on repeal of the Act.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments